Go to (on this page): content, search field of menu.
U bevindt zich op: Home › Publications › Audits
The Netherlands Court of Audit has investigated whether the government has a comprehensive overview of the volume and value of the property owned by the state of the Netherlands. We also considered whether ministries had sufficient information to consider the disposal of state property on a timely basis.
Volume and value
The 2010 state balance sheet puts the total value
of state property at €80 billion. In our opinion, however, the view
presented by the state balance sheet and the notes to this item is
not reliable.
We conclude that the government has only limited insight into both
the volume and the value of state property. The regulations issued
by the Ministry of Finance do not provide adequate guidance on the
preparation of reliable records and a government-wide overview of
state property.
Weak incentives
We conclude that the ministries do not have an
accurate understanding of the volume of property that could be
disposed of because they do not systematically and periodically
consider whether state property is vacant and/or no longer in use.
On balance, the incentives to dispose of surplus property are weak.
In consequence, the state may own more property than strictly
necessary to implement government policy. The government may
therefore be missing opportunities to save money.
We recommend that the Minister of
Finance clarify the guidelines on the recognition and valuation of
the property disclosed in the state balance sheet. Such guidelines
would improve the reliability of the view presented of state
property. We also recommend that the minister introduce guidelines
on the audit of property.
We recommend that the Minister of
Finance include the improved insights in the ministries' annual
reports. After the figures have been audited by the ministry audit
departments, the minister could include them in the central
government annual financial report and the state balance sheet.
To improve the timely identification of surplus state property, we
recommend that all ministers take stock of their properties as a
matter of course when reorganisations are carried out and consider
the consequences of reorganisations for their property portfolios.
If there is no concrete reason to take stock of the property, we recommend in general that ministers review the buildings and land in their property portfolios at least once every four years to determine whether they are necessary to achieve the ministries' policy objectives. We recommend that the Land Management Service (BBL) also periodically review the state property that it manages.
The Ministry of Finance will
include clearer criteria in the new manual on the European System
of Accounts (ESA). He will also investigate differences and will
improve the provision of information.
Ministries will prepare an annual strategy for their property
portfolios. They will submit the strategy to the Ministry of
Finance before the budget preparation. The property strategy will
include a periodic review the buildings and parcels of land in the
property portfolio. The agreements made on the strategy will also
apply to the Land Management Service. The minister does not yet
want to commit himself to a four-year cycle.