Go to (on this page): content, search field of menu.
U bevindt zich op: Home › Publications › Audits
The regularity of central government finances in the Netherlands was again of a high standard in 2010. This is a commendable attainment. A high standard of regularity will remain important in the years ahead, particularly as the government is seeking to establish a more compact civil service. A reduction in the size of the civil service will provide opportunities to make necessary improvements in operational management at a number of ministries, especially at the Ministries of Defence and Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS). Good operational management will also help keep track of the progress, performance and impact of a more compact civil service.
The regularity of central government finances in the Netherlands
is of a high standard. This is one of the conclusions presented in
the report State of Central Government Accounts 2010 that the Court
of Audit published on 18 May 2011. The Court of Audit has approved
the central government accounts and the central government trial
balance for 2010. There was a slight increase in the number of
regularity errors and uncertainties in 2010 but the number of
shortcomings in the ministries' operational management was
lower. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Social
Affairs and Employment (SZW) are two ministries that have improved
their operational management. At two other ministries (Health,
Welfare and Sport (VWS) and Defence), the Court of Audit found
persistent problems that require attention.
Objection against VWS grant management
The Ministry of VWS's management of grants
worth €2.3 billion has not been in order for 12 years. The
enforcement of statutory terms is inadequate, files are incomplete,
there are errors in advance payments and decisions on grant
decisions are inadequately reasoned. The efficiency of the awards
is therefore also uncertain. An improvement plan provided
insufficient assurance that errors would be prevented. The Court of
Audit therefore qualifies grant management at the Ministry of VWS
as a serious shortcoming. For the first time in several years, the
Court of Audit initiated proceedings to lodge an objection. The
Court asked the minister to report to the House of Representatives
on the progress made with the improvement measures before 1
October. After the minister presented an improvement plan, the
Court of Audit withdrew the objection. The Court of Audit will give
its opinion on the improvements to the House before 1
November.
The lodging of an objection, as the Court of Audit did this year in
respect of shortcomings in grant management at the Ministry of VWS,
is a rarity. It means that performance in 2010 (and previous years)
and the intentions for 2011 did not provide sufficient confidence
that improvements would be made. The minister was asked to explain
how the problems would be tackled.
Persistent problems at Defence, reorganisation requires
change plan
The second ministry with persistent problems is the
Ministry of Defence. The number of shortcomings in financial
management and, especially, material management is still high: 22.
In 2007 the Court of Audit carried out an objection audit of these
problems and agreements were made with the ministry regarding
multiyear improvement plans. Less progress was made in certain
areas in 2010 than foreseen. Furthermore, the significant spending
cuts at the Ministry of Defence have made it necessary to revise
the improvement plans. The Court of Audit believes new measures to
improve management should be an integral part of the plans to carry
out the economy measures. The Minister of Defence has accepted this
recommendation and has prepared an action plan to tackle the
shortcomings. The Court of Audit will follow the implementation of
this plan.
Ministry of BZK's responsibility for P-Direkt
inadequate
Other shortcomings the Court of Audit found in 2010
related to personnel management in both the centralised P-Direkt
personnel records (in operation at nearly all the ministries) and
in personnel management at the Ministries of Justice, Finance, and
Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM). The
shortcomings are evidenced, for example, in the continued payment
of salaries after a member of staff has been dismissed. The
Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (BZK) does not
adequately fulfil its responsibility for P-Direkt. Several
ministries use this shared service centre yet not all the
preconditions for the proper conduct of tasks were fulfilled. The
Ministry of BZK, the coordinating ministry, must ensure that
appropriate management measures are in place for the central
organisation that the participating ministries can rely upon. The
government is considering working with more shared services as part
of its Compact Civil Service programme. Four ministries (Economic
Affairs, VROM, VWS and BZK) spent more money on external staff in
2010 than the government thought appropriate (no more than 13% of
total personnel costs).
Improvements possible in procurement processes and European
procurement
There are still shortcomings in the management of
European public procurement at five ministries. Four ministries
(VROM, EZ, VWS and LNV) do not observe applicable legislation and
regulations for simple order and payment procedures and it is not
always certain that the performance the ministries pay for is
actually delivered.
Limited usefulness of policy information to House of
Representatives
The ministries disclose in their annual reports
that they together spent €237.6 billion in 2010. The information
provided by the ministries on what they have done with the money
has not increased in comparison with 2009. The Court of Audit could
not establish to what extent eight of the ten government objectives
it audited had been achieved. In the case of 19 of the 119
performance indicators audited, the Court queried whether the
preparation of the policy information disclosed in the annual
reports had been sound. The Court made recommendations on how to
improve policy information.
The Court of Audit has set up a website –
www.passievoorpubliekeverantwoording.nl – as a platform for
opinions and views on how political managers should account for
themselves. It specifically seeks the participation of industry,
the accounting profession and the academic world.
Better and more efficient controls of central government can raise
the standard of the ministers' accountability for their
policies. The resultant information on the performance and
operation of central government will then be more useful to the
House of Representatives and will in turn improve the quality of
parliamentary control. In the Court of Audit's opinion, which
it has included in the State of Central Government Accounts
2010 for the purposes of Accountability Day, controls should
conform with internationally accepted standards. The reorganisation
of the civil service is also an opportunity for the ministries and
the Court of Audit to eliminate duplications in their work.
In a period in which central government functions are being
centralised, the Court of Audit has identified ways to improve the
audit of financial information, operational management and the
quality of the policy information that ministers forward to the
House of Representatives. To this end, the ministry audit
departments must evolve into organisations that advise the
ministries' managers on improvements in operational management.
This advisory task is currently underdeveloped because the audit
departments also have an audit task and express audit opinions.
This is a duplication of the Court of Audit's work as external
auditor. Operational management should be in order at central
government, including the audit departments, even in times of
reorganisation.
Developments since the credit crisis
Since May 2009 the Court of Audit has reported
every six months on the progress made with the measures taken by
the government in 2008 and subsequent years to overcome the crisis
in the financial sector. The reports also consider measures taken
in response to the country crisis in the EU. At the end of 2010,
the State of the Netherlands still had €41 billion outstanding in
equity interests, loans and securities (year end 2009: €44
billion). A further €53 billion was outstanding in the form of
guarantees and €13 billion in commitments arising from the back-up
facility for ING. The risks to the State include ING's exposure
to the American housing market and the prefunding of payments from
the bank deposit guarantee scheme for the Icelandic bank, Icesave.
More and more financial measures are being taken in the EU to
tackle debt problems in the EU member states. The Fifth Report on
the Credit Crisis and the EU Country Crisis outlines developments
in the various stability mechanisms in the fourth quarter of 2010
and the first quarter of 2011. At the end of 2010, the Netherlands
had contributed more than €30 billion (including aid granted to
Greece). The European Commission says Greece is going through a
'critical period'. The Netherlands has guaranteed €2.4
billion in aid for Ireland.
In the Report on the Ministry of Finance's Annual Report for
2010 the Court of Audit calls on the ministry to make an ex post
calculation of the capital plan for the separation and integration
of ABN AMRO and Fortis Bank Nederland (both state owned). The
Minister of Finance has undertaken to do so. In 2010 the ministry
had no insight into the actual fund flows for the agreed capital
plan.
View of State financial position can be improved
At the request of the House of Representatives, the Court of Audit
made recommendations for the first time in State Balance Sheet:
view of the State's financial position on ways to improve the
State balance sheet. This annual statement of the State's
financial position currently falls outside the statutory audit
mandates of both the ministry audit departments and the Court of
Audit. In the Central Government Annual Financial Report, the
Minister of Finance does not explain the relationship between the
State balance sheet and other accounting information such as the
central government trial balance. The State balance sheet does not
include the financial positions of autonomous administrative
authorities or legal persons with statutory tasks. The House of
Representatives therefore has no insight into the financial
position of these organisations. They include the UWV employee
insurance agency, the Social Insurance Bank and the police regions,
which spend billions of euros from the public purse every year to
carry out public tasks. In consultation with Statistics
Netherlands, the Ministry of Finance and the House of
Representatives, the Court of Audit wishes to increase the insight
available into the State's financial position. The Minister of
Finance is willing to enter into a debate of the State balance
sheet but believes the instrument adds very little value to the
political decision-making procedure.
In addition to the overarching report and associated reports on the
ministries' annual reports, the Court of Audit has issued the
first Spending Cuts Monitor this year. This report and the tables
it includes for all 11 ministries describe how the government will
achieve the first spending cuts and economy measures in the €18
billion package. The tables show that the government has accounted
for €2.65 billion of the spending cuts in 2011. The coalition
agreement had included €2.9 billion in cuts in 2011, the
government's first year in office (see separate press release).